Share:
Hall Bulldog Project

Part of The Hall Bulldog Project — documenting Bob Hall's 1932 Thompson Trophy racer.

Explore the Project →

This is the first report from Mirco Pecorari of Aircraft Studio Design, documenting the process of creating an accurate 3D model of the Hall Bulldog for a full-scale replica.

The Design Process

Mirco’s approach follows a systematic 6-step process:

  1. Pictures and Drawings Analysis - Collecting and analyzing historical photos and drawings
  2. Pictures Matching and Perspective Understanding - Finding vanishing points, identifying distortion-free areas
  3. Draw 2 Dimensional 3 Views - Creating accurate 2D side/top/front views
  4. 3D Modeling Based on 2D 3 Views - Building the 3D model
  5. Comparison Between 3D Model and Pictures - Validating accuracy
  6. Delivery of Required Parts for Engineering - Exporting for mechanical engineering

This report covers Steps 1-3, completed as of June 2022.

The Challenge

Creating a precise 3D model of the Hall Bulldog requires accurate blueprints with dimensions, but unfortunately no complete drawings of the original plane exist. Only basic 3-views drawings were made by Mr. Bradford in 1932 and Mr. Galletti in 1933. A detailed drawing of the right wing was created by Mr. Bradford and used by Kevin Kimball for the wing model.

Historical photos and drawings of the Hall Bulldog
Historical reference photos and the Bradford (1932) and Galletti (1933) drawings

The remaining parts to design include the fuselage, horizontal empennage, landing gear, and struts. The goal is to create the most precise replica of the final version of the Bulldog—the one with the tall vertical stabilizer and rudder.

Step 2: Picture Tracing Method

One method used is tracing pictures to replicate the aircraft contour. To avoid mistakes from camera lens distortion, Mirco identified the vanishing point of each side-view picture to find areas where perspective doesn’t distort the lines too much.

Side view perspective analysis
Identifying the reduced perspective area for accurate tracing

Multiple photos were selected because different portions show different parts with reduced perspective distortion. The first two photos from the left are good for tracing the cowling, and the last two are good for the fuselage, canopy and vertical empennage.

Hartford photo perspective analysis
Hartford photo with perspective lines showing the vanishing point
Cleveland photo perspective analysis
Cleveland photo showing the aircraft on its dolly with perspective analysis
Cleveland photo composite
Another Cleveland photo providing scale reference with a person

Creating a Photo Collage

By combining the distortion-free areas from multiple photos, a collage can be created that provides an accurate reference for tracing.

Photo collage for tracing
Collage combining the best portions from multiple photos

Side View Tracing

Using the photo collage, Mirco traced the outline of the aircraft to create an accurate side view drawing.

Side view tracing in progress
Tracing the aircraft outline from the photo collage
Side view tracing result
The resulting side view tracing

Comparison with Bradford’s Drawing

The traced side view was compared with Bradford’s 1932 drawing to validate the proportions.

Comparison with Bradford drawing
Conclusion: Bradford’s drawing is good for fuselage proportion and outline contour

Step 3: Draw 2 Dimensional 3 Views

Fuselage Dimensioning

Using the known cowling maximum diameter of 1.33m, the fuselage proportions could be established.

Fuselage dimensioning
Establishing fuselage dimensions from the known cowling diameter

Wing Proportions

The wing proportions were checked against Bradford’s drawing and Kevin Kimball’s DXF wing model.

Checking wing proportions
Comparing Bradford’s wing drawing with Kevin Kimball’s model

Finding the Right Dimensions

Using the known wingspan of 7.9248m and cowling diameter of 1.33m, the top view dimensions were established.

Finding dimensions
Conclusion: Bradford’s top view drawing is good for fuselage/wings ratio

Side View Sizing Results

The final side view with all dimensions established:

Side view sizing results
Complete side view with dimensions including chord (1.028m), fuselage stations, and overall lengths
Side view with details
Side view showing surface details and panel lines

Comparison with Galletti’s Drawing

Galletti drawing comparison
Note: Galletti’s drawing is good for cowling proportions and fuselage length, but the fuselage is too tall

Tail Configuration Variations

The Hall Bulldog went through several tail configurations during its racing career. The 2D views document three versions:

Original Rudder

Original rudder configuration
The original rudder as seen at Bowles Agawam in August 1932

Extended Rudder

Extended rudder configuration
The extended rudder configuration seen at Hartford on August 23

Extended Fin

Extended fin configuration
The final configuration with extended fin, seen at Rhinebeck between August 22-28

Key Findings

  • Bradford’s drawing is accurate for fuselage proportion (diameter/length ratio) and outline contour
  • Bradford’s top view is accurate for fuselage/wings ratio
  • Galletti’s drawing is accurate for cowling proportions and fuselage length, though the fuselage is too tall
  • Known dimensions used: wingspan 7.9248m, cowling max diameter 1.33m, tire diameter 22 inches, chord at gull’s rib 1.028m
Jim Bourke